wheposters.blogg.se - The coup pick a bigger weapon zip

This caused a crap ton of bad reactions by kids who got the jabs and parents sued. Some lots had way too much active ingredient in them and others had nearly none. VAERS came into being because back in the 1970s the producers of the DTP shot had a quality control problem. This means that simply loading it into Excel does you no good and attempting to correlate and match the two tables in Excel itself is problematic due to the extreme size of the files - in fact, it blew Excel up here when I tried to do it.

Why? Because they separate out the specifics of the vax (the manufacturer, lot number, etc.) into a different file. You can grab the public data from it, but VAERS intentionally makes it difficult to discern differences in lot outcomes. Perhaps worst of all, reports are now being intentionally suppressed, the injury and death rate hasn’t changed and there are lots with one of the two above problems but it is being intentionally not reported, having been detected almost-instantly and health providers were directed to not report anything serious (e.g.This implies some sort of nefarious intent such as killing people on a differential basis or that the manufacturers are running unsanctioned experiments on a mass basis among the population at-large, since they know what is in each lot and intentionally varied the contents.OR Much worse, the lots are intentionally segregated to produce different results.

That is, some lots are ok, others are contaminated, have too much or too little of the active ingredient in them, some produce wildly more spike-protein than others in the body when injected, etc.OR

There is a serious manufacturing quality problem or you produced something without understanding how it would work in the body and thus failed to control for something you had to in order to wind up with reproduceable results.

one goes to all nursing homes, etc) adverse reactions should thus be normally distributed between lots if they’re not one of these things is almost-certainly true: Assuming the lots are not preferentially assigned to certain cohorts (e.g. Lots are quite large, especially when you’re dealing with 200 million people and 400 million doses.

What I found, however, was both interesting and deeply disturbing. That was wildly unlikely so I set out to disprove it and apply some broom handles to the tinfoil hatters heads. What originally got my attention was the tinfoil hat crowd screaming about lots being intentionally distributed to certain people to kill them - in other words certain Covid-19 vaccine lots were for all intents and purposes poisoned. There is an article floating around from The Expose that makes an explosive claim: There is a wildly statistically-significant skew in the death rate from Covid-19 vaccines by lot number.